International Viewpoint Archive

The Fourth International’s English-language review, from 1982

France: Who Are the "Anti-terrorism" Measures Aimed At?

· International Viewpoint No. 105, 29 September 1986 · p 28 · 890 words

France

Who are the "anti-terrorist"

FRANCE nationalists in the North of about "retali-

Chirac has talked on French soil

"retaliation"

mean. It is the operation of killer measures aimed at?

refugees in the south of France.

These death squads are made up of French gangsters recruited by the government of Spain, with the toleration of the French government, which itself hands Basque

THE WAVE of terrorist bombings in Paris has enabled the rightist government to speed up a long-planned repressive offensive. That, fundamentally, is what is involved. Otherwise, the measures taken by Jacques Chirac's government would make no sense.

The most important of these measures was the imposition of a visa requirement for all citizens of non-EEC countries except

Switzerland. The vast majority of those affected are American and

Scandinavian tourists.

GERRY FOLEY

The results of this measure, at least for several months, will be to overwhelm the French border guards so they will be even less effective in stopping any "terrorist infiltration"

Nonetheless, the Chirac government was prepared to pay a great price to

In 1985, impose the visa system.

2.4 million American tourists visited

France. That is equal to about 4 per cent of the total French population.

Swedish tourism cannot be unimportvisibility of ant either the given

Swedes in Paris this summer. And that is to say nothing of the

Japanese, during who are a growing presence the tourist season.

tourism already

American was sharply down this year, both because of the terrorism and the fall of the dollar against the franc. If Americans were frightened away by a few incidents on airliners, what sort of reaction can be expected from the

French government itself declaring the country a war zone?

meaning of the

The political

French government's measures is clear from the contrast between the attitude of the US government toward them and that of the Norwegian, Swedish and Austrian authorities.

The US approved measures discriminating against its own citizens, while the other governments affected protested strongly on behalf of theirs.

"In principle, the United States supports all effective acts to counter terrorism," state department spokesperson Bernard Kalb commented.

Why should the US consider that its own measures mainly affecting citizens are "effective acts to counter terrorism?"

The obvious answer is that the imperialist power wants to spread a net of political surveillance internationally. The US itself maintains a massive political police operation on its own territory.

US political surveillance has been was attested to recently in the court judgement on the suit of the US Socialist Workers Party against the government harassment (see page 22). It involved tracking SWP members in every aspect of their personal lives, as well as a series of break-ins into SWP offices, in at least one case through the services

US has sought collaboration in this sort of surveillance from European governments, as the harassment experienced by American radicals passing through Thatcher's Britain indicates. Now, obviously, it hopes that this will be extended

The proposal for computerized identity cards is being raised both in France and in the US. This has been one of the French right's more prominent "security proposals." It could make a system of political surveillance

Strict checks at frontiers could be a pillar of a system of general political surveillance, especially with growth of international travel. There is already talk of tougher border controls in other EEC countries, modelled on "collaboration against terrorism" by the European imperialist powers are pointed up by Britain's offer to send SAS teams to France. These forces, similar to the US Green Berets, have carried out a policy of assassinarefugees over to the very government that hires killers to assassinate them on its territory.

"Retaliation" means simply state

The French secret services are already organized for that, as the

Warrior bombing Moreover, the assassination of alleged internationally would evitably mean widening the pattern of para-police executions perfected in

It is an index of how much French liberals have lost their heads that Le Monde's editorialist wrote in the September 16 issue that the visa system had probably stopped "Middle Eastern Terrorism" in the US. Not only is there no evidence for that, but it ignores the political role of this provision. The use of the US visa system for political discrimination and intimidation has been well-known and deplored by defenders of rights in France for decades.

After all, the threat that terrorists pose to the general public is limited. It is the capitalist press and a general fear in response to these

In its September 17 issue Rouge, the paper of the the Fourth International, wrote:

"Once again blind terrorist acts serving as the pretext for unleashing a campaign that is all the more hysterical because it is being fostered by a climate of national

"This is war,' Jacques Chirac of the Quotidien de favors establishing a state of siege....

"These ravings might seem funny. But they should They show that the rulers will do anything to try to impose what they have had difficulty in getting accepted before - the reduction of individual freedoms, criminalization of solidarity with third world peoples, making anyone with a dark skin a suspect."

The French government's measures are part of an international conspiracy by the imperialist governments to turn frontiers into prison walls. They should be answered by an inter national campaign of exposure protest.

← Around the World: Britain, Ireland, USA · France: The Diabolical Logic of Colonial Interference →

Something wrong on this page?