International Viewpoint Archive

The Fourth International’s English-language review, from 1982

Sri Lanka: No Friend of the Poor

· International Viewpoint No. 246, June 1993 · pp 8-9 · 1,058 words

South and Southeast Asia

SRI LANKA

----- photo credits and running heads -----

8

No friend of the poor

International Viewpoint #246 June 1993 paign. But it is very unlikely that Anura's leadership will be challenged.

UNP economic policy has antagonised workers while pauperising the peasantry. We cannot then, attribute their rural support to the success of their poverty alleviation programme. The rural masses are in a very difficult situation. They consider a vote against the UNP as a

The obituaries following President Premadasa's assassination were, very serious step that might bring bad almost without exception, sycophantic in the extreme; praising the late repercussions. A vibrant opposition

President's 'common touch'. Below, we publish an 'alternative obituary' movement is necessary to pull these layers away from this defeatist mentality.

in order to counter at least some of the more glaring fallacies that have

Although the PA coalition is accepted by a majority of workers it has not penetrated the rural masses to the same extent. The

DUNF has support amongst the new rich

THIRUNAVUKKARASU* — May 8, 1993 middle classes in the rural areas. Elsewhere, they have managed to draw upon the support of urban working class elements.

The NSSP, with nine other radical organisations, contested all 17 districts. It was a successful campaign, reaching millions in the southern areas. In particular, we explained the right of self-determination of the Tamil people to the Sinhala masses. One comrade was elected and the Party's overall vote was 59,514. However, we have had to accept that militant workers have abandoned us for the PA. The opportunist opposition leaders were successful with their vicious campaign to isolate us from the rank and file.

They kept on slinging mud, even claiming that we are paid by the UNP regime to break up and divide the opposition. They compared us with Ossie Abeygoonasekara, the infamous left Presidential candidate who walked over to the the UNP.3 Not only were we isolated from the workers, but also from the youth.

The influence of the Janatha Vimukti Peramuna (JVP — Peoples Liberation Front) was clearly evident when workers abstained or spoiled their votes deliberately.4 This reached 10% in areas where JVP activity was high during 1988/89 disturbances. This certainly indicates the distrust of radical youth towards the parliamentary electoral process but racism is also a feature. Provincial Councils are considered by Sinhala chauvinists as a gift to the minorities. Though there was no campaign for a boycott all Sinhala chauvinist groups, including the Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (MEP People's United Front), supported one. *

3. Ossie Abeygoonasekara and his Sri Lanka Mahajana Party were a part of the the United Socialist Alliance that was formed in 1988 and included the Communist Party, LSSP and the NSSP.

4. The Sinhala terrorist group were effectively wiped out by army action in southern areas in late 1989 and early 1990.

P RESIDENT Ranasinghe Pre-

madasa of Sri Lanka was assassinated during a May Day parade. In parts of Sri Lanka fire crackers were set off in celebration. But some sections of the national and international media have portrayed him as a hero and a friend of the poor, particularly since he was himself of poor origin.

He was a friend and favourite of imperialism in the South Asian region. He was a demagogue, maintaining on the one hand (for public consumption) that he would not be cowed by the terms of any foreign lending agency; while on the other, he carried out to the letter the dictats from the IMF and the World Bank.

He was also a highly authoritarian President. His former minister of Food and Cooperatives accused Premadasa of running a "one-man-show" and, about a year and a half ago, spearheaded an impeachment motion against him. This was none other than Lalith Athulathmudali, who was shot dead just one week prior to the assassination of Mr Premadasa.

Whenever Premadasa faced a political crisis, such as the impeachment motion, he would plead that he was a common man and that the elites were all out to cut his throat. But he had proved that he could outshine the classical comprador bourgeoisie (represented by former President Junius Richard Jayawardena, the late Althulathmudali et al) by implementing every imperialist dictat on privatisation or cutbacks in vital social services.

Premadasa had become "widely praised in the business community for his economic policies including one of the fastest privatisation programmes and most extensive deregulation campaigns in Asia".! This, of course, has meant big rises in unemployment, cuts in wages and the consequent fall in living standards. The 1991 United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) report on Sri Lanka bears ample testimony to this:

"In the current situation in Sri Lanka, the entirety of the poor have become vulnerable. Indeed nutritional assessments indicate that they have become adversely affected. Such a situation places the poor, pregnant and lactating women and pre-school children in especially difficult circumstances. The situation is worsened by the increased susceptibility to infections to which the under-nourished are prone. The plight of these groups is further aggravated by their limited access to effective, proper

Premadasa boasted that the growth rate was 4.8% despite the civil war in the north and east. For 70% of the population this means nothing. The country is groaning under the weight of a debt burden of US$ 5,000 million, an increase from US$ 284 million in 1978.

His utterly evasive and sterile approach to the Tamil national question has led to an intensification of the 10 year long war between the government and the LTTE, especially by aerial bombing that has targetted hospitals, schools, refugee camps, examination centres and places of worship. The war now devours Rs 25bn a year. Over 50,000 lives have been lost in the north and

It is clear, even from this brief balance sheet, that Premadasa was no friend of the poor. Rather, he was anti-poor. For all his posturing on poverty alleviation, even the already eroded food stamp relief scheme was being wiped out in devious ways. Indeed, he was a friend and favourite of imperialism. Premadasa has fallen to the very methods of State repression and terrorism that his regime employed for silencing dissent. *

* Thirunavakkarasu is a leader of the NSSP.

1. Financial Times, May 4, 1993

----- pull-quotes on this page -----

been produced.

----- photo credits and running heads -----

9

← Sri Lanka: UNP Serendipity · Palestine: The Circus in Washington →

Something wrong on this page?