International Viewpoint Archive

The Fourth International’s English-language review, from 1982

The Event: Imperialist Contradictions

· International Viewpoint No. 289, June 1997 · p 4 · 835 words

France Africa United States

Imperialist contradictions

Send no cash with order. We will invoice you.

@ PECI, PO Box 85, 75522 Paris, cedex 11 France e-mail 100666.1443@compuserve.com fax 331/43792961 Rest of world US$ 70 O

* the event by Eric Toussaint and Denise Comanne The double defeat of French and Belgian imperialism is cause for celebration. This is France's first major defeat in Africa since Algeria won its independence in 1963. As for the former colonial power (remember the "Belgian Congo""?), Brussels had just managed to re-build its cosy relationship with the Mobutu dictatorship, when it imploded like a

Throughout the 1990s, France has repeatedly intervened in its African "backyard." Presidents Mitterand and Chirac supported Rwandan leader General Habyarimana, despite knowing that his regime was planing this century's third major genocide. The French army trained the Rwandan army and the interahamwe militia. When the FPR rebellion started, Paris repeatedly intervened to save Habyarimana.

The summit of this shameful interventionist policy was Operation Turquoise in July 1994 The French army interposed itself to allow the orderly withdrawl of the defeated regime's army and the genocidal militias, which set up a state-within-a-state inside the refugee camps of eastern Zaire.

From July 194 until November 1996, France hoped to use these refugees as a tool for the creation of a new pro-French regime in Rwanda. The spinal column of this new regime could only be Habyarimana's defeated genocidal army.

With French support, this rump regime used one million hutu refugees as a human shield, and a source of new recruits. Those media crying so bitterly about the fate of the remaining Hutu refugees in Zaire are silent about the grand "humanitarian operation"

Paris supported Zairian dictator Mobutu Seke Seko until the last minute. France helped Mobutu recruit Bosnian Serb mercenaries, apparently through the good offices" as mercenaries, and thrown in to the regime's last desperate counter-attack. Switzerland and Belgium finally decided to deny Mobutu entry. France let him run Zaire inc. from his luxury home on the Côte d'Azur. Who's counting on Kabila?

With the regional gendarme backing Mobutu, where did Kabila get sufficient international support for his lightening offensive across the heart of Africa? Mainly from Congo-Zaire's neighbours: Angola, Uganda, and the new regime in Rwanda.

The Mobutu dictatorship was a menace to the security of all three countries. Jonas Savimbi of Unita was threatening to bring his Angloan rebel troops out of their Zairian bases, and resume hostilities. In the East of Zaire, Mobutu provided bases for guerrillas fighting the Museveni government in Uganda, and, of course, the remnants of the genocidal Rwandan regime.

The early victories of Laurent Kabila's Alliance forces in the Goma and Bukavu region were partly due to direct and indirect support from the Ugandan and new Rwandan governments. We can only approve of their aid.

Once the Alliance had taken the initiative, and started making quick headway against a Mobutist army that disintegrated and fled, the United States decided that they were more likely to benefit from supporting the Alliance and Zaire's neighbouring countries, than a dictator who's days of were clearly numbered. Uganda and Rwanda were already priority states for American diplomacy in the region. The South African connection

South African capital found a common interest in supporting the American initiative. South African mining companies and banks have long had their eye on the copper belt to the north, and Congo-Zaire's Shaba province in particular. South African capital was more than ready to invest in Congo-Zaire, as soon as stability could be guaranteed.

President Nelson Mandela, who's rule is based on a historic compromise with the white capitalist class, was also determined to see Mobutu fall. Partly because of the dictator's co-operation with the Apartheid regime in supporting the Unita rebels, and partly because the corrupt, sclerotic Kinshasa regime contradicts the new image of Africa which Mandela wants to promote, so that the continent can reduce its isolation from the global economy, and benefit from it.

Thanks to the compromise between Mandela and South Africa's white capitalists, the United States now has the possibility of exercising considerable influence over a large part of southern and central Africa.

The Alliance is by no means a puppet of the United States. But Washington will clearly have considerable weight in Laurent Kabila's deliberations in the coming months. Unlike France, the US recognised, and declared, that Mobutu should retire, at a sufficiently early point in the conflict to be (almost) credible. Kabila also knows that it was Washington which blocked France's plan to deploy a multi-national military force in Zaire in November 1996, to prop up the dictatorship. *

Analysis with attitude — and half price for those under 26

International Viewpoint: the Fourth International's hard-hitting monthly magazine

YOUr NAME

ADDRESS

CITY

CODE

E-MAIL/O.

COUNTRY

Belgium

Denmark

Germany

Greece

Holland

Spain

Sweden

Australia/NZ

Canada

USA regular youth BEF 2000 0 BEF 1000 O

£25 £13 DKK 380 DKK200 DM 110 DM 55 6000 dr 0 3000 dr

195 150 6000 pts 3000 pts SEK 400 0 SEK 200

← The Event: The Congo Challenge · The Event: The People Are Ready for Change — Interview with Congo Health Minister Jean Baptiste Sondji →

Something wrong on this page?