International Viewpoint Archive

The Fourth International’s English-language review, from 1982

Europe: Britain: Another Blow for the Labour Left — Ken Coates Interview

International Viewpoint No. 298, March 1998 · pp 3-6 · 2,522 words

Britain and Ireland Italy Greece and Cyprus

AGED insertion into the labour market. But it is still not clear how these programmes will be financed contents europe

2

Germany's unemployed take to the streets • Angela Klein

3

Britain: another blow for the

Labour left • Ken Coates interview

Bloody Sunday • F. Stuart Ross

6 asia

Asia's four-in-one economic crisis

• Maxime Durand

Philippines: economic meltdown

8

• Sonny Melencio and Reihana

Mohideen

Rebuilding Palestine's left

10

• Nassar Ibrahim (PFLP) interview

12 Israel: general strike • Sergio Yani

14

No More War Against Iraq!

• Fourth International declaration

(feminism today

15 Introduction• Penny Duggan

16 Women and sex • Nancy Herzig

Pornography: ban it or read it?

19

• debate

25 women's strike support groups

• Terry Conway

27 This violent world

• Estela Retamoso americas

30 Against the Buenos Aires

Concensus • Ernesto Hererra regular features

36 Radical press review books

Keep up the pressure!

the day of action depended solely on local initiatives.

Despite these structural difficulties, the day of action attracted nation-wide media coverage, and had a tremendous political impact. Several days earlier, the conservative government had insisted that "action against unemployment"

The unemployment question has heightened tensions between the Christian Democrats and their coalition partners: the Liberals and the Bavarian CDU. The "social tendency" led by Heiner Geissler, and half-heartedly supported by Labour Minister Norbet Blum, must take place in accord with the EU wanted the government to spend DM4-

Luxembourg Agreement of November 5bn ($2-2.5bn)

1997 - a "back to work" plan based on cutting unemployment and welfare benefits to force more of the jobless to job-creation on schemes. This provoked violent protests from CDU leader Wolfgang Schaube.

If unemployed groups and trade accept any job offered at any wage. The unions can maintain the pressure with current minimum revenue guaranteed by the social security system is to be abolished

Local authorities have been given responsibility for creating jobs and schemes for 200,000 people over the next two years. Planned liberalisation of the labour market will allow private employment agencies to manage much of this work.

For those school-leavers unable to find work, there will be some temporary further demonstrations, unemployment will probably become the main issue in the run-up to parliamentary elections later this year. The plan is to organise monthly protests to coincide with the publication of new unemployment statistics. The biggest challenge facing activists is to use this time to resolve the political and organisational problems of a fragmented movement, and build new beyond the ranks of the unemployed

3

----- pull-quotes on this page -----

36 NetWorking • Internet action

Another blow to the Labour left e-mail 100666.1443@compuserve.com fax 331/43792961

Ekt kar SEvoving: Flavng ElEkTS, Epeddou 34, 106 81 Anva, m. 3300675. Tuzoyaos: loavng Kotatos & Zia, Mapivou Avtino. 4, 163

46 2лоло2л. tnл. 9719048. Editor and director: Yannis Felekis, Eressou 34, 106 81 Athens, Greece. Printed by loannis Kotsatos & Cia, Marinou Antipa 4, 163 46 Ilioupoli,

* Britain European MP Ken Coates is the latest victim of the purges within Britain's Labour Party. We asked him about his expulsion, his parliamentary work, & the prospects for rebuilding the Labour left There's been a lot of confusion in the British media. Did you leave, or were you expelled?

Well, that's simple. I've been expelled three times - from the European Parliamentary Labour Party, from the Socialist Group of EuroMPs, and from the Labour Party. There was no hearıng, and I was not asked even one question. I was informed after this that there was no right of appeal.

It was only after this that I decided to sit with the GUE (Gauche Unifie Europeenne-European United Left) bloc as an independent Labour EuroMP. I chose to sit with the GUE because it consists of socialists, and because I am following the socialist whip (voting guidance) in exile, and from where I now sit I can see when the whips put their thumbs up or down.

I have an amicable relationship with the socialist group, the GUE, and the Greens - we have all been working together in the Full Employment Convention. We established an inter-group structure on employment a year earlier, to prepare for the Convention last May. I have no problems relating to any group on the European left. International Viewpoint

• What do you think lies behind the moves of Labour leader Tony Blair and the Labour bureaucracy to change the electoral system for Euro-MPs? Were they simply motivated by a wish to get rid of supposed "trouble-makers"?

Oh, there's clearly more behind it. It would be very vain to think that they needed this mighty steam-hammer merely to get rid of a couple of nuts. The fact is, any system of proportional system which Britain must introduce before the next elections to the European Parliament] would purge the European Labour Party -it would halve the numbers, assuming that the voting figures remain more-or-less the same as last time. So there would be about 30 Labour EuroMPs, rather than the current 62.

What Blair and the leadership wanted to do was not only to get rid of the critics, but also to make the Labour group in the European Parliament more obedient. There is some evidence that they are pursuing this goal by changing the calibre of Labour EuroMPs. They would like a strong business element, and many business people would follow Blair's restrictive view of the social dimension of the EU.

The move towards feminisation of the list also goes with a Blairite shift. Of course, if we had a different Labour Party, then different women would be able to come forward.

At the same time, there is no regional party structure to match the electoral regions coming into existence. Several years ago, I proposed that the Labour establish functional regional parties, as part of the move towards regional gover ment. If my advice had been followed then, the Labour Party would now have regional structure following the propose European electoral regions.

The new EuroMPs will represen regions, and be appointed by the party they will not be answerable to any consti tuents. My region will have six member for three million voters, who will simpl vote "Labour", "Conservative", "Liberal or whatever. • What response have you had to your expulsion?

The response has been remarkable. I have had an enthusiastic fan mail, with hundreds of letters of support. Over 400 members of my constituency have replied to the questionnaire I sent out; 87% of them oppose the changes to the electoral system, and 78% are against welfare cuts The rest favour reforms to the welfare system, some of which I would agree with. Reform has got a bad name now, and become synonymous with 'cuts. But I would support reforms to make welfare services more answerable to their users, and more accountable to their workers. • What role have you been able to play as an EuroMP? If you were to be reelected as an independent, how would this effect your work?

The issue is not about re-electing me. but opposing the incubus of New Labour. I have worked hard as an EuroMP; I rephalf price until 31 March!

Analysis with attitude!

YOUr NAME

Eleven issues, delivered by airmail for only

ADDRESS

L---

Denmark

Germany new subscribers regular

DKK200

DKK 380

DM 55

DM 110

3000 dr

6000 dr U

CoDE.

CITY

E-MAIL/O

COUNTRY

Send no cash with order. We will invoice you.

& PECI, PO Box 85, 75522 Paris, cedex 11 France

4 International Viewpoint #298

Greece

Holland

Sweden

*•**

Australia/NZ

Canada

Rest of world f95 f50

SEK 400 O

SEK 200

CS 80

CS 40

USS 70

USS 70

- PECI, BP 85, 75522 Paris cedex

----- photo credits and running heads -----

MISTER SINCERITY 1997 - © 5ieue Boll 1997 - 1026-18-11-97 resent a large coalfield, which has seen mass unemployment, minimal job opportunities and widespread reliance on the welfare system. My book "Community Under Attack" discusses many of these problems, which have kept me very busy. • Will you form a new party, link up with existing formations, or campaign

I'M SORRY...

SO SORRY!!

I DON'T

WANT TO

SİNCERITY 97 to be re-admitted to the Labour Party?

No, none of these. I have written to all members of the Labour Party National Executive Committee pointing out that it is a bit vindictive to expel me from the European Socialist Group, and asking them to confirm that there is no objection to my continued membership of that group as an Independent Labour EuroMP. At one time, there were three different Italian Socialist parties in the group. But my continued membership depends on the decision of the Labour Party leadership.

But I am not appealing for reinstatement to the Labour Party, because I have no right of appeal. I expect this right to be reinstated when we get rid of Mr Blair.

Nor do I want to establish a new party. Rather, I favour a network bringing people who have stayed in the Labour Party and want to fight against the cuts, and of those who have left because they oppose the cuts. In my region, I have had correspondence from dozens of people, many in the Labour Party. I want to try to bring these people together, to see how we can organise.

We need a wide network around a few simple demands: for defence of the welfare state and redistribution of wealth; for full employment, and against the current state of permanent mass unemployment; against undemocratic changes to the electoral system and abolition of constituencies. Members must be elected by the electors, not appointed by the party leaders. • These attacks on welfare are linked to the drive towards a European single currency and the attempt to cut government spending across Europe.

It's partly linked to the single currency, but I think you are mistaken to see this as central. The convergence criteria are being fudged. Britain in fact easily meets all of them, and is not participating for other reasons, mainly pressure from media baron Rupert Murdoch.

Maastricht is the wrong target. Belgium and Italy will be admitted to the single currency, even though they fail by a long way to meet the criteria. It is true that the bankers are setting the agenda, but that doesn't mean that governments can just do as they want. For instance, there are massive battles going on across Europe over a shorter working week.

This is not to say that we disagree over the effects of Maastricht; much of the discussion on this was fuelled by my report some years ago to the European Parliament on the results of its application. But what will be a hundred times worse than

MAKE TROUBLE Maastricht will be Agenda 2000, which governs the expansion of the EU to the

The GDP of the eastern European states is under half that of western Europe. Most of them are under 35%. This will mean a huge export of unemployment from east to west, undermining all of the welfare provision. It will lead to the wrenching apart of the capacity of these

I am for an expansion of the EU to the east, but this must be properly funded, to protect the social gains of the post-war • What about Blair's agenda as President of the EU for Europe-wide legislation enforcing job "flexibility' -ie weakening of workers' rights and lowering of wages?

We should not presume the battle is over merely because this is what Blair has said. Many European ministers did not agree with the Thatcherite agenda of the Tories, and do not agree with it now that Blair is pushing it. He wants to prevent a "social Europe' and to bring about the unravelling of the welfare state., but he

Part of the problem of the lett in Britain is its failure to understand Christian Democracy. These parties should not be equated to wet Toryism; they are sociologically different. They were part of the resistance to Nazism, they are mass popular parties, some with their own trade unions and co-operatives. They are far removed from Conservatism, leave alone Thatcherism. If we fail to understand this, we will not realise the difficulties in the way of Blair's Thatcherite agenda. • What advice would you give to activists, particularly to those in the Labour Party.

Organise. Fight to defend the welfare state. We must win the battle over

PENIS? WHAT PENIS? disability benefits. The proposed education reforms are unsustainable, we must campaign to restore grants and abolish fees. There must be a major allocation of resources to the health service.

Britain devotes a smaller proportion of its resources to welfare services than any EU state except Greece, Ireland and Portugal. Activists can and should persuade MPs to vote against these cuts.

But MPs will pay as much attention whether or not these activists are members of the Labour Party. So those on the British left who say "stay in the Labour Party and fight" have to explain how we

Otherwise, people will stay at home and dig their gardens. Actually, of course, you can oppose the cuts from inside or outside the Labour Party, provided you work out what you can actually do.

It is true that Labour Party members still have a distinctive role in this struggle, but it is becoming more difficult than ever before. The changes in party structure mean that it will no longer suffice to win an argument and take a motion to conference; instead, it will be sent to a policy forum for a possible decision in three years - by which time we will have lost the welfare state.

There is a mass exodus taking place from the Labour Party - 10% of my members of the party in my constituency have left. And these are not the Blair

, but Old Labour, single mums, people who are losing welfare benefit.

The opposition, after much effort, was proud that it rightly persuaded 47 Labour MPs to vote against the cuts in lone parent benefit. But single mums in my constituency said to me "What? Only 47? Only 10% of them? That's not what we voted

So we must network, bringing those in the Labour Party and those outside in order to oppose this agenda. The trade unions too must join this opposition. And no-one should write them off - when they move, they can move surprisingly fast. *

Waiting 26 years for British justice didn't want to wait 26 years for justice for ordered that Roisin McAliskey be extradited of the men who were killed that day."

She was quick to add, however, that she psychological damage

On 2 January, a British magistrate parliament there would be a new her daughter. Roisin McAliskey has been to Germany. Now that the formal order to imprisoned in England without formal extradite has been issued, Roisin's fate lies inquiry into one of the most tragic charges for over a year now. She spent six in the hands of Jack Straw, the British Home events of Ireland's "Troubles" - months in London's Holloway Prison, Secretary.

← Europe: Germany's Unemployed Take to the Streets · Europe: Bloody Sunday →

Something wrong on this page?